So, who's been naughty then?

In today's NBR there is an article about a lawyer who is charged by the Serious Fraud Office with defrauding legal aid from the Legal Services Agency. The case came to light when a secretary noticed she was billing for hours of work done when she wasn't even in the office.

The article reveals:

• The lawyer is a female


• The lawyer is prominent (i.e. you've probably heard of them)


• The lawyer is from Wellington


• That the suppression order includes the type of work she is accused of so the paper is unable to say if it is for criminal, civil, family law or Treaty of Waitangi work.

Now, work it out - it's not hard.

P.S. I've disabled comments on this post as I don't want any speculation.