Random Thoughts from Under the House
No doubt you've seen the blue penguin on TV who promises you the 'warmest feet' in the world. To prepare for his arrival I spent 4 hours in the crawl space under the house clearing out rubbish the previous owners/residents left. Here are some of the random discoveries and thoughts I had:
- You never appreciate how big your house is until you have to crawl the length of it underneath.
- If you ever inspect a house and find piles of rubbish under it, don't think the existing resident will clear it out. And don't think it will only take an hour if they don't.
- I would be embarassed to admit to drinking Rheineck, Fosters and Steinlager Blue. But if you bought it, the cans should go into the rubbish after you drink it, not under the house.
- Ditto the bottles for Pink Marquee Vue, cheap French Cuvee and even cheaper Brandy
- Finding a dead hedgehog gives you a start.
- But not as much of a start as realising it's actually alive and trying to get away.
- Six Foot Three Inch Men are not designed to fit into a crawl space about two feet high.
- Ditto entrances that are 30cm high.
- Banging your head on the plumbing and floor support beams hurt - a lot.
- But not as much as picking up a piece of wood with a nail protuding from it.
- I hope the neighbours didn't hear what I said when I picked up a piece of wood with a nail protuding from it.

4 Comments:
"...Rheineck, Fosters and Steinlager Blue. But if you bought it, the cans should go into the rubbish after you drink it... Ditto the bottles for Pink Marquee Vue, cheap French Cuvee and even cheaper Brandy."
I linked to your site through FrogBlog. Your ecological consciousness seems narrow. Great to know you're on yer bike (Mike... ahem, not funny...), but surely resources for which re-use infrastructure exists, should indeed be re-used.
We all need to expand our consumer mindset... We need to consider (and blog about!) all the costs of consuming. In the case you encountered under your house; as a prior occupier threw "waste" under there you bore some cleanup cost of their consumption. I trust you have passed the rest of the cleanup cost to the council recycling system.
I'll assume however that you're simply referring to the lack of recycling systems back in the day when Rheineck, Fosters and Steinlager Blue were consumed copiously...
"rubbish"? Rubbish. Recycle!
By
Guv, at 3:52 PM
Guv:
Point 1. I hate being called "Mike". Nowhere in my blog, website, posting on other sites do I ever refer to myself as any other than Michael. Calling me any other variation on that name will may get you banned from this blog.
Point 2. Stenie Blue was sold briefly when I was a teenager - i remember two Pommie friends liking it, but I thought it tasted like crap. I can't remember when Pink Marque Spew, er, Vue was last sold. I am well into my thirties nowadays so, yes, kerbside recycling was not available then. However, Comalco did offer a recycling service and many kids collected cans to make pocket money. It was stopped because of my next point.
Point 3. It's worth pointing out that 15 years under the house has not been kind to the cans and that they are in a un-recyclable condition. Besides, it is not enviromentally friendly to recycle cans in Wellington as the nearest facility is approx 1000km away - and they are trucked there. So no - not all resources for recycling should be used.
Point 4. How would you know how enviro-concious I am? From a flippant post on my blog? Get real and get a life - I'd take on the average Khandallah Greenie in an enviro-challenge and win.
Point 5. This blog is called "Ellis in Wellyland". Until such time as you marry into my family, take my surname and contribute to the cost of running the website I will be the sole judge of what I blog about.
By
Michael, at 9:54 PM
Think of the ecological advantages occuring from the installation of underfloor insulation - there will be less energy needed to keep the house from getting damp and cold.
Those cans did look pretty nasty - all filled with dirt. Washing them out would waste water. And putting them for recycling with mud means some person at the depo would have to manually sort them out and arrange for them to be dumped and bear the cost of it.
Basically, the original owner should have practiced recycling with comalco, swappa bottle etc at the time. Or perhaps he should have drunk less booze.
IF ANYONE WOULD like to clean them out and recycle them we are happy to let you come over and collect them!
By
Chaucey, at 9:59 AM
As far as I was aware that cans and bottles have always been receylable if you make the effort, however if the cans are rusted then I don't think they are accepted.
Sounds like the previous owner (or occupier) couldn't be bothered.
Anyway it doesn't sound like much funny crawling about and dragging somebody else's mess out.
By
Anonymous, at 4:48 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home