Robson on National
Matt Robson's latest newsletter shows a fascination (or an obsession) with the National Party.
He claims that the Nats:
But then, that's the difference between being a Party with almost 50 MPs and thousands of members and having a solitary MP and not having any members to distribute leaflets.
In fact, if the Progressive Party can't find a dozen or so people in Auckland (remember that's home to a third of the population of New Zealand) to support a candidate in a by-election you really must question whether they have the required 500 members nationwide to be legally registered as a party.
He claims that the Nats:
- Can't agree on leadership
- Can't agree on policy
- Can't agree on drug policy
- Can't agree on alcohol age policy
- And so on ...
But then, that's the difference between being a Party with almost 50 MPs and thousands of members and having a solitary MP and not having any members to distribute leaflets.
In fact, if the Progressive Party can't find a dozen or so people in Auckland (remember that's home to a third of the population of New Zealand) to support a candidate in a by-election you really must question whether they have the required 500 members nationwide to be legally registered as a party.
posted by Michael at
4:56 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home