This one has been bubbling for a while, now the Tama Iti episode has made it boil over.
I've got a little concerned about the critics of the Police handling of the Tama Iti shotgun incident. From what I saw on television Tama Iti looked like he had brandished a shotgun at the Waitangi Tribunal members, then fired into the flag on the ground (while holding the gun at his hip - cringe)
The police recieved a complaint, and investigated. Tama Iti has now been arrested and charged with firearms offences.
Now Wednesday Stephen Franks and others led an attack on the Police Minister about the delay from the incident to the arrest. The Minister simply said that it was up to the Police to investigate and charge Iti when the investigation was complete. That was the end of it as far as I could see.
But no, there were allegations that Iti was not being charged because he was a Maori radical.
Now the typical policeman would not be impressed by this allegation. The police do an excellent job, often in very trying situations.
These allegations as a growing 'conspiracy theory' that our law and order machines - the police and the courts - are not producing the correct outcomes becuase of political pressures. I never criticise the Police or any part of the court system for any investigation or verdict. (I do have problems with some sentencing.)
NZers have gotten very good at denouncing the outcomes of trials from what they see in 30 seconds of television or 4 inches of newspaper article each day. But if you ever sit at the back of a court for a whole trial, start to finish, you would have a different perspective on it.
How can we say that Scott Watson or David Bain are innocent when 12 people have listened to all the evidence presented - for and against - and then made up their minds on that basis.
The one murder case I sat through from start to finish was not exciting at all - most of it was spent cataloguing every item related to the investigation, proving a chain of evidence (including that the victim found in the street was the same person who died in Hospital the following day) and the interview in which the accused gave his statement to the police.
Before I had seen the trial I was afraid the accused would get the charge reduced to Manslaughter. After seeing the evidence I was clear that there was no chance of it. After 6 hours of deliberation the jury returned - guilty of murder.
So before you criticise the police for being too slow to investigate you have to remember the bar for conviction is very high. Only a thorough investigation of the incident will ensure that all the gaps in the prosecution are filled.