One of the reasons New Zealand is a sucessful democracy is that we have separate, independent arms of Government. Our Justice system is no under the control of any politician. In fact, our Justice system has taken legal steps against a number of MPs:
Donna Awatere-Huata (convicted of fraud)
Shane Ardern (charges of disorderly behaviour dropped when it was clear no conviction could be obtained)
Nick Smith (contempt of court)
Ruth Dyson (Driving while under the influence of alcohol)
John Banks (broke civil aviation law)
(There was also an MP in the 90s banned for accumalting too many speeding tickets and another charged after he fell asleep while driving injuring a passenger - but I can't recall their names.)
Police have also issued a stern warning to the Prime Minister over Paintergate, and to David Benson-Pope over his inappropriate disciplining of students.
So today I was a little disappointed that National attacked the Police for not charging the Labour Party over it's breach of the spending cap. The Police investigated and found that there was insufficient evidence to charge the Labour Party. I haven't seen the evidence, so don't want to second guess the Police in this matter.
If National really thinks Labour should have been prosecuted, and that the Police were influenced by political pressure, they should get and review the evidence that was presented to the Police first before making accusations.
However, I am totally behind National's call for Labour to refund the taxpayer for the pledge card. The Pledge Card could only be described as a request for votes as it was setting out Labour Priorities for Government if it won the election. If it was only about Government policy, then it would not have included the Student Loans promise which specifically was called 'Labour Party' policy, not 'Government Policy' by Labour before the election to avoid Government agencies scrutinising the plan.